Under the 1886 Presidential Succession Act, the line of succession to the Presidency was limited solely to the members of the US Cabinet. The Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate weren't reintroduced to the succession until the 1947 Act.
This presents the possibility of an intriguing constitutional crisis during the period the 1886 Act was in effect. If (a big one, I'll admit) the entire line of succession were eliminated, how would a successor be found?
My own thoughts (assuming the apparatus of government is otherwise intact):
Both houses of Congress would convene and elect their respective presiding officers. A new succession act would then be introduced, and quickly passed, that would place said officers in the line of succession.
While there would be no President to sign the legislation, it would become law regardless after 10 days in accordance with the Presentment Clause. The now legal successor (either the Speaker or the Pro Tempore) would then be sworn in as President or Acting President, depending on the exact stipulations of this new act, and proceed to appoint a new cabinet.
This would resolve the matter with the minimum of legal fuss, though it does nonetheless result in a troublesome ten-day 'interregnum' where the country must make do without a leader.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
This presents the possibility of an intriguing constitutional crisis during the period the 1886 Act was in effect. If (a big one, I'll admit) the entire line of succession were eliminated, how would a successor be found?
My own thoughts (assuming the apparatus of government is otherwise intact):
Both houses of Congress would convene and elect their respective presiding officers. A new succession act would then be introduced, and quickly passed, that would place said officers in the line of succession.
While there would be no President to sign the legislation, it would become law regardless after 10 days in accordance with the Presentment Clause. The now legal successor (either the Speaker or the Pro Tempore) would then be sworn in as President or Acting President, depending on the exact stipulations of this new act, and proceed to appoint a new cabinet.
This would resolve the matter with the minimum of legal fuss, though it does nonetheless result in a troublesome ten-day 'interregnum' where the country must make do without a leader.
Anyone else have any thoughts?