WI the Teutonic Knights never came to Prussia? Let's say they remained in Transylvania or simple they were never invited by Polish prince Konrad of Masovia. What are the consequences for Poland, Lithuania, Old Prussians, Livonian Knights etc.?
Yes, but what about Drang nach Osten? The Germans are an expanding people that are looking to colonize somewhere; if not the Teutonic Knights, than german people may just come and settle in Poland without direct Germanic rule. The Polish nobility seemed to prefer the German settlers, as they were loyal, paid taxes, and often were skilled in western european trades that did not exist in great quantities in the East. Remember, when the knights came, Danzig was exclusively a German city that resisted control by the German Order in favor of the Polish King. Perhaps greater settlement of the East with a friendlier attitude between the Germans and Poles initially, but when the Western most provinces of Poland become basically German, the various German kings/princes are going to come knocking later on in history, looking to annex them into the Reich/Prussia/whatever.
WI the Teutonic Knights never came to Prussia? Let's say they remained in Transylvania or simple they were never invited by Polish prince Konrad of Masovia. What are the consequences for Poland, Lithuania, Old Prussians, Livonian Knights etc.?
Plus the Teutonic order also helped unite the Lithuanians and Poles, making possible the later union. Without a common enemy the pagan Lithuanians and the Catholic Poles would fight each other, essentially wearing themselves down, perhaps making themselves MORE vulnerable in the long run, perhaps allowing for greater Germanic penetration into Eastern Europe. Maybe Poland falls apart sooner as a result, but who knows. The pesky butterflies are so unperdictable.
The most likely outcome is a more bitter eastern European feud among the Slavic groups and Baltic peoples, with German settlers moving in for more freedom from the German princes further west. Eventually those princes are going to be looking to expand their power and if Eastern Europe is disorganized, they will fall victim to ambitious nobles looking to carve out an empire and establish a base outside the Holy Roman Empire.
Who knows, perhaps the German Order actually set back German expansion!
Why would they fight each other?Plus the Teutonic order also helped unite the Lithuanians and Poles, making possible the later union. Without a common enemy the pagan Lithuanians and the Catholic Poles would fight each other, essentially wearing themselves down, perhaps making themselves MORE vulnerable in the long run,
German penetration? Which tiny German duchy or county is going to penetrate into Eastern Europe? Germans were way more divided than Poles.perhaps allowing for greater Germanic penetration into Eastern Europe. Maybe Poland falls apart sooner as a result, but who knows. The pesky butterflies are so unperdictable.
There actually were not that many German settlers and after the Black Death the flow of settlers stopped. Many were polonized in Greater Poland and Lesser Poland provinces. Silesia was very mixed. In Pomerania peasantry spoke Slavic till 30 years war. Prussia was only "Germanized" in 18th century.The most likely outcome is a more bitter eastern European feud among the Slavic groups and Baltic peoples, with German settlers moving in for more freedom from the German princes further west.
This statement works both ways - a disorganized Germany could fall victim to ambitious Polish dukes.Eventually those princes are going to be looking to expand their power and if Eastern Europe is disorganized, they will fall victim to ambitious nobles looking to carve out an empire and establish a base outside the Holy Roman Empire.
There was little need to import settlers to the Baltic countries because the Baltic region largely escaped Black Death and German aristocracy were not 19th century German nationalists.Valdemar II said:There's no doubt it did, the fast conquest of the Baltic Countries and the conversion and enserfment of the natives under a German aristrocracy resulted in little need to import settlers to the Baltic countries.
Religious differences, plus Lithuania was expanding as an empire, which means there very well could be a struggle to determine the pecking order in the East. Now there could have also been detente and a marriage just like OTL, but that is much easier if both sides were fighting a common enemy that is trying to take control of the area. Chances are that a power struggle would happen. I am not an expert on Polish-Lithuanian relations in the period, but speaking of broad trends in human and European nature, it is a stronger possibility than if the German Order was battering down the door.Why would they fight each other?
No one up front. I am speaking about the future. In the coming centuries there will be a "peaceful penetration" of Germans escaping the confines of princely control for the freedom of the east. The population pressure was building in the west, especially in the lowlands in the north. In the east, the trade skills that the Germanic settlers brought with were in high demand, as the local population had not produced enough skilled workers (not speaking of Congress Poland, rather the lower populated areas on the coast that still had pagan tribes).German penetration? Which tiny German duchy or county is going to penetrate into Eastern Europe? Germans were way more divided than Poles.
Well, there were not millions of settlers moving in to Poland straight away, as the process happened over centuries. But as time went on, the German populations all over Eastern Europe were expanding through settlers and natural growth. The Black Death cut off immigration for some time, but as farming improved in the 15th and 16th centuries, population pressures began to build, sending more people the Eastern Europe. Again, I am speaking of the long term, not the 12th and 13th centuries exclusively.There actually were not that many German settlers and after the Black Death the flow of settlers stopped. Many were polonized in Greater Poland and Lesser Poland provinces. Silesia was very mixed. In Pomerania peasantry spoke Slavic till 30 years war. Prussia was only "Germanized" in 18th century.
Very true. It could happen, given that the Polish were not attacked ITTL. But they had trouble exerting control over the periphery of the nation. Centeralization was a benefit of having to fight a powerful enemy. However, the Poles had a tendency not to like central control, which makes it less likely that they would be able to centralize enough to take over the German principalities. They didn't OTL, despite being more powerful and dominant after the Teutonic Knights left (Brandenburg/Prussia excluded as they fell under Polish control intermittently for a while).This statement works both ways - a disorganized Germany could fall victim to ambitious Polish dukes.
There was little need to import settlers to the Baltic countries because the Baltic region largely escaped Black Death and German aristocracy were not 19th century German nationalists.
Also serfdom came way later - gradually from 16th century it became stronger reaching its zenith in 18th century. The Latvian or Estonian peasant duties differed very little to those which German peasants in Brandenburg, Holstein, Mecklenburg or Saxony had to perform to their local manoral nobility.
Poland would be more successful in taking on Pomerelia in 14th century without strong force to compete with.WI the Teutonic Knights never came to Prussia? Let's say they remained in Transylvania or simple they were never invited by Polish prince Konrad of Masovia. What are the consequences for Poland, Lithuania, Old Prussians, Livonian Knights etc.?
Was done, you would have to buy the article though:WI the Teutonic Knights never came to Prussia? Let's say they remained in Transylvania or simple they were never invited by Polish prince Konrad of Masovia. What are the consequences for Poland, Lithuania, Old Prussians, Livonian Knights etc.?
Masovia was the periphery. Up to 14th century Silesia was the strongest in terms importance region of Poland, with most serious contenders for Polish throne coming from there.But they had trouble exerting control over the periphery of the nation.
They were creating alliances earlier due to fights of Lithuania with Muscovy.Without a common enemy the pagan Lithuanians and the Catholic Poles would fight each other
They were fighting over 14th century. But keep in mind that was presence of Teutonic knights that pushed Poles' expansion more to the East.Religious differences, plus Lithuania was expanding as an empire, which means there very well could be a struggle to determine the pecking order in the East. Now there could have also been detente and a marriage just like OTL, but that is much easier if both sides were fighting a common enemy that is trying to take control of the area. Chances are that a power struggle would happen. I am not an expert on Polish-Lithuanian relations in the period, but speaking of broad trends in human and European nature, it is a stronger possibility than if the German Order was battering down the door.
The pressure that forced Lithuania and Poland to unite was not the Teutonic knights, but the Grand Principality of Moscow and Russia latterPlus, I am suggesting that there may also be a power struggle for control of the east, and nations that were aligned OTL, Lithuania-Poland, perhaps would not, as there was no outside pressue to join together. Given human nature, it is likely that these two nations would fight for dominance of the East instead of uniting. This means wars, which generally means depopulation, which in turn makes the East more attractive for settlers looking for cheap land, and beneficial for the Polish princes to attract skilled labor from the West.
But Mongols didn't reached Baltic.Well, the Black Death might have spared Eastern Europe, but the Mongols sure didn't. That was a major cause of the German Drang nach Osten: the devestation caused by the invasion left entire areas depopulated, which meant that the Germanic peoples to the west were actively welcomed by the Polish nobility. Similar situation in Hungary.
Why?, the start of Prussian expansionism depended only upon the rulling character - Friedrich the Great. Same kind of guy may come to the throne in Oldenburg, Baden or any other German duchy.Without Prussia there would be less expansionistic ideas,
"Inferior Barbarians?" That's in the spirit of the 19th century nationalism. Also the idea of "Drang nach Osten" is way more often attributed by Slavic writers to Germans, not in the other way. Plus it is also a 19th century invention.and less tradition of viewing Slavs and Balts as inferior barbarians. Also the idea of Drang Nach Osten would be diminished.
Why do you assume that no matter what kind of events happen in history, the Brandenburg is going to press for unification of Germany sooner or later?Would Brandenburg be strong enough to press for unification of Germany in the way Prussia did or would Austria assume that role ?
Interesting butterflies in regards to future of Germany.
Without Prussia there would be less expansionistic ideas, less militiarism
Would Brandenburg be strong enough to press for unification of Germany in the way Prussia did or would Austria assume that role ?
The origin of Prussia was in expansionism. To the extent of my knowledge it was the only surviving crusader state., the start of Prussian expansionism depended only upon the rulling character - Friedrich the Great. Same kind of guy may come to the throne in Oldenburg, Baden or any other German duchy.
Might be, but he wouldn't have the combination of supreriority complex towards the east, his country origins as crusader state and militarism.In fact, it seems more likely to assume that at least one German prince would have the same idea. Maybe not the same success, but certainly the same ideas.
Well butterflies don't mean changing the whole world-many changes there would be but geopolitics would stil leave similar resources and population drifts to certain regions.It doesn't have to be Brandenburg or Austria.
Funny, its quite present in XVIII century in Prusssia."Inferior Barbarians?" That's in the spirit of the 19th century nationalism.
Is that why Frederick the Great settled German colonists to displace Polish population ?Plus it is also a 19th century invention.
To certain regions, but not to certain states, Brandenburg-Prussia only got catapulted to great power status after the acquiring Silesia, the taking of which is far from inevitable. Without the Pomeranian, Prussian or Silesian provinces Brandenburg probably would just be another mid-sized German states, probably without less power in the north than Bavaria in the south.Well butterflies don't mean changing the whole world-many changes there would be but geopolitics would stil leave similar resources and population drifts to certain regions.
One question is what about the Teutonic Knights? What do they do instead of riding off to fight the Prussians?
WI the Teutonic Knights never came to Prussia? Let's say they remained in Transylvania