Humanity survived seventy-five years of peace. During this time, all stakeholders agreedEvery border problem was solved?
Interesting that UK is still a EU member.
View attachment 221370
Finally I got my map to work and you guys can finally criticize it.
Central Australian State doesn't make a great deal of sense, tough. Isn't the whole place the equivalent of an uninhabited desert, mostly because it is an uninhabited desert?
That's because there aren't many things to make borders around in Australia. The river (as here and OTL) or watersheds basically.- Convergence. Your borders (inner and external) are really close to what really exist today in the south-eastern part.
It could still survive. It would be mineral rich, low population, possibly a tax haven or something.Central Australian State doesn't make a great deal of sense, tough. Isn't the whole place the equivalent of an uninhabited desert, mostly because it is an uninhabited desert?
Perhaps it even becomes as successful as the Central African Republic or the Central African Empire.That's because there aren't many things to make borders around in Australia. The river (as here and OTL) or watersheds basically.
It could still survive. It would be mineral rich, low population, possibly a tax haven or something.
That's because there aren't many things to make borders around in Australia. The river (as here and OTL) or watersheds basically.
Without water reserve, or access to sea? People inhabiting there doesn't need to drink or trade efficiently anything? At the very best, it would make it a bantustan for a neighboring state.It could still survive. It would be mineral rich, low population, possibly a tax haven or something.
Thanks for that. Um...... where to begin....Well, I suppose this is your first then :
-What is the Point of Divergence, or what made it possible? Maybe you don't have one, and that's no really annoying, but it looks a bit random.
- Convergence. Your borders (inner and external) are really close to what really exist today in the south-eastern part.
There's a fairly good use of longitude lines, on the other hand : you avoid the most obvious trap of map thread, known as "straight line syndrome".
Central Australian State doesn't make a great deal of sense, tough. Isn't the whole place the equivalent of an uninhabited desert, mostly because it is an uninhabited desert?
Perhaps it even becomes as successful as the Central African Republic or the Central African Empire.
The late 1840s were a gruelling time for the peoples of Europe. The hungry forties saw the spectre of famine visit every corner of the continent from Corke to Lvov. In 1848 the French monarchy fell and the Second French Republic was installed. Little did the Jacobins know that this act would spiral into a decade of warfare which would shatter the post-Napoleonic order and forge a new, uneasy European status quo.
Does anyone recall a map with no less than four big-ass roman successor states/empires? It was a half-globe map IIRC, and there was a big egyptian empire, a big greek empire, and I can't exactly recall the other two.
Bruce
Without water reserve, or access to sea? People inhabiting there doesn't need to drink or trade efficiently anything? At the very best, it would make it a bantustan for a neighboring state.
Thats more or less what i was going for. " an Australian Nunavut", i like it. It is though, more of a neutral, buffer state; kinda like Switzerland.Like I said, that was a territory for a brief period, and it's been suggested that it be resurrected as an Australian Nunavut. In the circumstances, it actually could work as an independent Aboriginal state- small capital at Alice Springs, mostly nomadic population elsewhere. It would be very sparsely populated and probably surviving more as a buffer state between the others, but it's not totally unfeasible.
I think I remember. There was also a Western empire and a north africa empire. Wasn´t it a "Lets Darkness fall"-map?
A few comments, Ephraim:
1. 16 Kilotons is not a fluke - that's engineering. That's the same output as the Hiroshima bomb. You need some fairly precise ramming together of U-235 pieces with high explosive to get a yield like that. A runaway critical mass giving them all lethal radiation poisoning seems likelier...
2. I suspect Russia is going to be in rather fewer pieces before long - a lot of those states seem a bit tenuous.
3. Why haven't Hungary's neighbors piled on as OTL?
4. Bomb Germany's nuclear project. Well, that's going to do a good job on reducing that antisemitism.
5. I can imagine the conspiracy theorists - the Elders of Zion have sent Israel back in time with evil Einstein-science to save it from well-justified destruction and to take over the world in the past...
Bruce
Point, that does seem a little high. I was thinking that someone was experimenting with suspending one hemisphere of enriched Uranium over another and moving them closer and closer, then something slipped. Perhaps that isn't feasible- I'm not an atomic scientist. Do you know where I could find information on runaway critical masses on the web?
Nice - my principal objection is that too many people seem to be too successful too fast.
Sounds just like the Demon Core (except with Uranium.) You wouldn't get an atomic explosion with a runaway critical mass, just a shitload of radiation, like Bruce said.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core