Frederick the Great marries Amelia of Great Britain

So I finally managed to get my fathers copy of Clarks Iron Kingdom and atm read it. He mentions that there was a plan to marry Frederick the Great (then the crown prince) to Amelia of Great Britain, the second daughter of Georg II. According to Clark Frederick became a strong supporter of the match and the soldier king preventing it contributed to his attempt to flee for France.

Upon reading a bit more about it, it is not quite as simple as that. George I., who was in general in favour of the idea, delayed it the first time, because he considered the couple to be not old enough (11 and 12 years old). The marriage agreement should have been finalised on his next trip to Hanover, but he died on the way and his son was far less in favour of the match. The political conditions he wanted were not acceptable to Frederick William (and FWs in turn not to George II.). Furthermore the Austrians learned rather early of the match and through extensive bribing formed an influential lobby against the match (led by the Prussian minister of war and the Prussian ambassador in London, who made quite a sum from the incident it seems).

But George I. might well not suffer his stroke on the way to Hannover, but a year or so later. Frederick William might well be persuaded by a trusted advisor like the old Dessauer that the impact on the already strained relationship with his son could be worse than a politically less than optimal marriage (pointing to the example of the Great Elector who staid out of reach of his father for fear of the wrong marriage) and that said marriage might even mature the crown prince. And Austria might learn too late about the marriage (or underestimate its likelihood) to built much momentum against it.

Lets say the marriage goes through until 1730. Frederick will still not be terribly interested in his wife, but she was not forced on him and he won´t resent her as his otl wife since neither his Fathers pressure nore Habsburg meddling were involved. His conflicts with his father will likely be reduced, though not vanish, if Frederick William backs of a bit after the marriage as he did otl. Certainly Frederick won´t attempt to flee this time. Might lack a few of the lessons he learned in civilian administration from his release from prison until he was reinstated into the army later on.
Of course Austria won´t like the marriage.

Any idea what effects will be in the long run?
 
So Old Fritz still doesn't consumate the marriage?
Maybe, maybe not. There are indications that even his otl marriage was consumed. But probably not often and only in the earlier years given the known reservations Fritz had against the marriage, which won´t be a problem in this case. Of course there is the possiblity that either partner of the otl marriage was infertile. If it was Elisabeth, Amelia probably had a child otl. In Fritz case it might have been contracted with an STD he is rumored to have gotten 1730 in Saxony, which would probably be butterflied in this scenario. So this alternate marriage may produce offspring but it is not certain to.
 
With the marriage Britain might decide earlier to ditch Austria (which might be already pissed due to the marriage) and build Prussia up as counterweight to France on the continent. Or take a more neutral stance and try to keep both on its good side. Before the Silesian Wars Prussia was seen more as a powerful medium power than as a great power. Thus it might hope to add Prussia to its system of alliances without causing a diplomatic revolution as happened later otl. Don´t think it could work, but Britain might try at least until Frederick attacks Silesia (which I think he will ittl too early in his reign if the opportunity presents itself). After all Fritz was not considered as particular martial as crown prince. Nor was the German dualism set in stone before the Silesian Wars: Politically they had their tensions, but in wars Prussia often had sided with Austria.
 
Frederick II, King of Prussia and Elector of Brandenburg (b.1712: d.1786) m. Amelia of Great Britain (b.1711: d.1786) (a)

1a) Frederick III, King of Prussia and Elector of Brandenburg (b.1733: d.1801) m. Sophie Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (b.1737: d.1817) (a)

1a) Frederick William II, King of Prussia and Elector of Brandenburg (b.1756)

2a) Charlotte Frederica of Prussia (b.1758)

3a) Augustus George of Prussia (b.1759)

4a) Stillborn Boy (c.1761)

5a) Dorothea Wilhelmine of Prussia (b.1764)

6a) Ludwig Ferdinand of Prussia (b.1767)

8a) Stillborn Boy (c.1768)​

2a) William Augustus of Prussia (b.1739: d.1769) m. Elizabeth of Great Britain (b.1741: d.1759) (a)​
 
Kynan could you please stop posting those bloody family trees in every single pre-1900 thread dealing with marriages, it's incredibly annoying not least because you seem to assuming an incredibly high level of fertility for early modern people.
 
Kynan could you please stop posting those bloody family trees in every single pre-1900 thread dealing with marriages, it's incredibly annoying not least because you seem to assuming an incredibly high level of fertility for early modern people.

a) That is not a family tree.

b) Really? You klick to open a thread that has an alternate dynastical wedding in its bloody title line, and then berate a poster who has suggested names and living dates for the hypothetical children from this hypothetical marriage?

c) George II had eight legitime children by one wife, Friedrich Wilhelm I had fourteen children, also by one wife. Just to mention the most obvious counter-examples.

Making misleading and rather nonsensical historical claims is IMO a worse offense than monotonous postings.
 
Top