How many troops does Syagrius have in total?
Actually a somewhat difficult question. In the first half of the 5th century, when regularly still fighting Imperial forces, a lot of the Barbarian groups could put up to about 20,000 men on the field. Those forces of course varied in quality from hardened military professionals (often with experience in the Roman army) to reservists more comfortable with a plow than a sword. Although they rarely had need to mobilize those kinds of forces in the second half of the century, I assume they still had the kind of manpower base necessary to do so if pressed.
Going off that we can try to supplement the meager historical information we have. Given its ability to (for a few decades) fend off serious barbarian attack in our period, but also noting its eventual failure, I would put the total available military forces in Syagrius's realm at around 15,000.
That said, Syagrius is not going to be able to actually fight with an army like that. For one thing many of those men are needed on semi-permanent guard duty on the various frontiers. Others are under the command of subordinates whose willingness to follow Syagrius's orders is very limited.
At this point, the 3,000 odd men that he mobilized to fight along the Somme is probably the largest feasible field army for him at this point. Now faced with a major defensive crisis he could definitely do better than that, but on an 'elective' campaign, he's quite limited. But of course given the importance of the political constraint, a change in political affairs in the Domain could easily change his ability to mobilize troops.
awesome and very well written. I like how the story shows how much the Romans had fallen, that one of their greatest battles is fought with a couple of hundred men and each skirmish of a dozen or so warriors can prove decisive.
I bet Syagrius would love to be in command of Roman armies from even 50 years prior.
Also, the entire region seems very volatile and could probably swing whichever way.
I like the idea of showing some 'little guy' battle perspectives. Fundamentally, no matter how large the force you're fighting in, for individual soldiers a lot of whether you live or die is dependent on you and the couple of people standing either side of you.
I actually like to think of the region as having a being under a kind of 'Stability of Impotence' effect. Yes every political regime is relatively weak, and vulnerable to being swept away. But because that's true of
every regime in Gaul (without a great and willing to take risks leader like Clovis), nobody is really in a position to seriously undermine everyone else.
To really swing things, you need either some external stimuli, or some coalition formation.
Great update. Do you have map of Syagrius' realm and the disintegrating Frankish kingdom? This is really quite good and I'm trying to picture the borders. I'm hoping that if Syagrius can get some victories on his board how sustainable his 'kingdom' would be.
Also has he any contact with the remaining (?) Romano-British, if they even exist during this period.
At this stage you're just as well off looking at an OTL map for the 470s/early 480s. No real 'division' of the Frankish regime on a territorial basis has happened yet, with a lot of people still hopeful the succession can be resolved at court. And while Syagrius's seizure of Amiens is a major win for him, it doesn't really change the border since that city was right next to his territory to begin with.
In a few years we may have a few more changes to show, and then I'm planning on doing a (likely poorly drawn) map.
As for the Romano-British, they are very much around. They have only limited contacts with Gaul right now, but look for that to change soon...
Excellent POD and very solid writing style. If you need to fill in some information on larger events to set your stage you may consider the faux history book approach from the future of your ATL, that seems to work well.
Going forward I will definitely be using the faux history book approach at times.