Consequences of a more active naval theatre in 1870/71

After watching the recent Drachinifel video on the topic: The naval side was pretty much a sideshow of the Franco-Prussian war and the only real engagement happened outside Havana of all places. The North German navy did a decent job all things considered and achieved its strategic goals (helped by French naval incompetence): They prevented the planned troop landings by French forces (in coordination with coastal artillery) and the blockade was pretty much a joke. Despite the fact that force composition was not in their favour. They happened to own the most powerful ironclad in the world at the start of the war, but they did not even have the repair facilities for its few modern ironclads until halfway through the war. As a result the major combatants were down with engine problems shortly after the war began. Even at the best of times the French had betwen a 5:1 and 10:1 advantage in naval forces, depending how you count. The few sorties by the German "battle line" to get an isolated part of the French fleet did not find any ships, although the possibility existed in the first and last part of the war. The most effective ship on the German side was probably SMS Arminius, a coastal ironclad that sortied several times and harrassed individual blockade ships. She never caught any, but she also succesfully escaped superior forces due to her shallow draft. After being prevented from doing so at first for diplomatic reasons, late in the war the navy sent out a few raiders, although with very limited success.
Given that the navy mostly sat in port during the war and barely fought in it, it had a hard time afterwards. Its funding was almost frozen at prewar levels and barely profited from the victory. Instead of any of the Admirals a senior army general, Albrecht von Stosch became head of the Imperial Navy. He actually did a decent job in making the navy more professional and oversaw the start of indegenous warship construction, but also had problems. His strategy was firmly defensive with a focus on unarmoured screw corvettes for trade protection and low draft ironclads for coastal operations. That resulted in the very flawed Sachsen class and the "adequate" SMS Oldenburg. He also always had a real problem to get sufficient funds not just because the navy had little political weight, but also because he himself was regarded as opposition by Bismarck as an old liberal and due to political mistakes e.g. after the sinking of SMS Grosser Kurfürst. The neglect of the German navy continued until the overcompensation beginning with Tirpitz.

But WI there were some more actions, which, while not changing anything strategically, make the German navies role in the war more visible? For that matter what would be the impact of an actual naval war on the French navy, which otl could point at the German unwillingness to face them and their decent performance in the land war?
 
It's possible that if their ironclads didn't suffer engine problems after cruising through the Channel they could have been a nuisance to the French fleet, and maybe even have taken out a French ship caught off guard, but it wouldn't make much a difference I think...

In the end Germany didn't really need a large navy in the first couple of decades after 1870, and by the time Tirpitz began his shipbuilding programs the ships that would've been built in the 1870s and 1880s ittl would be pretty out of date already, especially after the dreadnaughts were introduced. In that regard otl might've been better for the navy and government, with expensive shipbuilding programs being pushed further back until it was needed and ships had a bit more staying power.

Maybe Germany would've had a slightly larger empire had they not neglected their fleet in that period, maybe it would have affected the Boer Wars (but not changed the ultimate outcome), but those ships wouldn't have helped them in WW1 at all... In fact without the need for a massive build-up Germany's navy in WW1 might have been weaker with more outdated ships.​
 
Problem is logistics and supply for french naval operations.

Best way to solve this is get Denmark to join the war in an attempt to regain the Southern Jutland and use Copenhagen as a coaling station for French naval operations in the Baltic.
 
Problem is logistics and supply for french naval operations.

Best way to solve this is get Denmark to join the war in an attempt to regain the Southern Jutland and use Copenhagen as a coaling station for French naval operations in the Baltic.
I am actually more interested in possible consequences after the war if anything happens at sea at all, be it as simple as a short inconclusive clash of German ironclads with French blockading forces.

I wonder if some more action might avoid the total subordination of the German navy to army ideas about naval warfare (mainly coastal defense) and the consistent lack of funding that plagued the German navy until the mid-90s. OTL the fleet plan of 1873 actually reduced the number of full scale ironclads compared to the 1867 one in favour of monitors and floating batteries (which most of the navy did not actually want and never built). Even some of the "full scale" ironclads built afterwards were entirely designed for coastal service and were very bad at seakeeping (Sachsen class) or even completely useless without major rebuilds (Siegfried class). Likewise the long range cruisers until SMS Irene (laid down 1887) were getting progressively more outdated, as they were all modified from the same Amtsentwurf 1873/75 which was decent, but not particulary modern even then.
What would the navy actually do with a bit more independence and more consistent (although not necessarily much larger) budget? And how would it change politics? How much contributed the ridiculous state of the navy in the mid-90s to the widespread support for a large and rapid expansion? And what about diplomatic effects? Germany would not exactly be a threat to the RN either way, but would a slow but steady build up to a mid-sized navy give Germany more diplomatic weight in certain conflicts? Would the RN still be able to sell a mere modernisation program as the same kind of threat the rapid expansion was seen as? What else did I miss?

And again what about the French? OTL they escaped scrutiny for their role, as much could be blamed on the Germans not coming out to fight and on political decisions/failures outside the scope of the navy. And at land the artillerists and marines actually did a decent job. OTOH the navy also did not gain anything in the upheaval after the war, as it was not very visible during the war and reforming the army was more pressing. The threat they noticed most was the limited raiding done towards the end of the war, helping down the way to the Jeune École. But WI there is a clash of ironclads, if seen as an upset or as a successful French performance? Still the chaotic policy changes of otl? A more successful JE? A less successful one?
 
Top