LeinadB93
Monthly Donor
We'll get there eventually, but I'm wondering
- whether Bharat/ Greater India/ Lahore is a kind of supranational confederation like the OTL EU,
- if Lake Chad, Aral Sea, Qattara Sea are on the map because of chartographistic convention or signs of a generally wetter/ cooler climate,
- what tendencies can we see in TTL, for example does the GEACS plan on expanding to South Asia, the Pacific or even to South America,
- do the South American Hispanic countries have their own separate monarchs or is there some kind of Spanish community,
- what's the motivation behind the republicanism in non first world countries if the most developed nations clearly favour monarchy?
Great questions:
- The Lahore Treaty Organisation is best described as a NATO equivalent but with a substantial unified foreign policy.
- The Aral Sea has survived due to no Soviet irrigation projects, Lake Chad exists in an enlarged state due to a successful replenishment project under the French Union, and the Qattara Sea was due to a successful macro-engineering project. Though yes there is a generally wetter/cooler climate (owing to earlier and more widespread adoption of nuclear energy and effective mass transit systems, plus a few larger volcanic eruptions).
- That's an interesting and nuanced question.... I suppose in broad strokes there is a growing antagonism between the French Union and the GEACPS on one side, versus the Samarkand Pact. Japan and the GEACPS are dealing with many internal issues at present, so expansion is not really on the cards, but Indonesia and Sulawesi look likely to be future flashpoints, as does the China-Manchuria-Hainan mess. Nicaragua is a potential flashpoint for the Commonwealth and the Summit of the Americas. The Samarkand Pact are making economic and political inroads in the Middle East and Africa, as France and Britain decline. The whole Transcaucasia mess could blow up in Russia's face, as could its support of Tingitania.
- Separate monarchs, all of which are descended from the Spanish, or Brazilian or both, royal families.
- The prevailing trend is that where a country originated from a protectorate with a single dominant ethnic group and a clear monarch (e.g. Ashante, Barotse, North Africa) in the post-independence period these monarchies largely continued their pre-independence status. Most of the republics in Africa and Asia originate where a nation has a multitude of ethnic groups with no single dominant potential monarch (e.g. Nigeria, Indonesia, Zaire), or where the monarch of the colonial power briefly remained head of state post-independence (e.g. Tanganyika, Dravida Nadu, Bengal). Hope that makes sense.
RIP John Moses Browning, patron saint of firearms
Indeed. Nothing to say he doesn't exist ITTL... just not as a Mormon missionary.
Does South Africa have its own separate monarchy?
Also, I assume that India has constituent monarchies?
I assume the dynasty in question is the House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, like in the original version of this timeline?
BTW, I'll be glad to help brainstorm ideas for this timeline if you like.
- Nope, South Africa has the British monarch as head of state.
- Yes they remain, as subnational consituent monarchies.
- Yes that is correct.
- Thanks, much appreciated.
Last edited: