Okay, why does the colonial empire immediately collapse? Britain seems to have the capabilities of defending it for the moment. And losing a colonial empire doesn't make people go right-wing immediately.
Why does its economy collapse? It would have economic problems, but it wouldn't be in a...
Without a whole civil war to fight between Whites and Reds, Poland and Finland have basically no chance of opposing the Provisional Government, I would like you to remember that despite still having a lot of other fronts to fight the Reds were defeated only trough a miracle. Bosporus being...
It wouldn't, but then I have misunderstood your post, could you explain what you meant?
Very similar to fascist, why does Britain have to go right-wing if it loses WW1?
The reason they gave that many loans to Russia was because it was backwards and because some things (such as the railway network) needed to be done fast, AH isn't in that position so no reason to give them loans, it's just as asking why doesn't Britain give loans to France to develop Brittany...
Germans might think that but in reality the railway network does not allow all the food Germany would ever need to transit from Ukraine/Southern Russia to Germany, especially if the railway network is less developed ITTL.
First due to different politics the Balkan Wars would probably be...
If they're just a few agitators Stalin will see them as goners and the reason there were that many communists the whole time was because someone was sending them, here the CCP leadership is either captured or in exile.
I was just saying that China even without the communists and Japan is...
A more competent UK advisor to the Provisional Government does not make them win, they're still starving, with Bolsheviks growing and military defeats. The Provisional Government was doomed IOTL, you need to change something else to keep Russia in the fight.
Let's say it's not the most likely...
I doubt France has the capabilities of holding this colony literally on the other side of the world with its far inferior navy compared to the British, the latter ones could take it during the ARW or in 1792.
No, the Lend Lease was not a big price to pay for the US and UK in exchange for a stronger USSR which did most of the fighting trough the entire war, the UK will suffer more since now they're the only ones fighting the Axis in Europe until the submarine problem in the Atlantic is solved.
He sends a little bit of material support and not much changes, I doubt he has a navy able to defeat the Egyptian one.
France, Britain and Russia decline/ignore, all GP had an agreement about keeping down liberals, category in which Murat enters as a former Marshal of Napoleon so he's not seen...
They were especially horrible, as essentially all of Southern Italy (including the common people) tried to prevent them from becoming their rulers, which will not get them benevolent attention.
The Normans were in conflict with the HRE because they backed the Pope against the Emperor and to create their kingdom they conquered ERE land in Southern Italy, if they're on an adventure in North Africa they'll at least have conflicts with the HRE and they will be in an even worse position...
Because the vast majority of resources were taken when fighting the Soviets (80% of Germans forces in the early stages and never went under 60% in the entire war), the only significant loss of the Germans to the WAllies before D-Day was in North Africa in 1943, without having to fight the...